القائمة الرئيسية


Family Between Religion and UN Documents: Union Named and Secured Difference

7 سبتمبر, 2017

  • شارك

Recently, everyone cheered to adopt UN council of human rights decision about family protection that warns from the growing weakness that faced it by family.In 3rd of July 2015, it had voted about the decision that approval by most of the countries members of the human rights council, the decision confirms that family is the normal and essential group unit for community, the family have the entitle to protect the state and society.

It is a step –even it’s too delayed / late- but we must valuation. However it issued by international organization that its steal the focus of the hopes of people.
Yes, its step delayed despite touch the most important unit in the live of societies that is the family.

Although what the family has to main role in breeding generations, except that international conventions didn’t give it the decent care such it comes a lot of conventions, and it bedevil the items completely from any sign for the term of the family despite it takes about women’s issues that imposes itself to talking about the family. However the conventions take the woman as member that curtailment from the social context.

The statement issued by the forty eighth session of the Commission on the Status of Women that was entitled “ The Implementation of the Nairobi Forward-looking Strategies for the Advancement of Women “.

The statement talked about importance measures to implementation these strategies to achieve the goals in “ peace, improvement and justice “, and didn’t mention anything about family otherwise it focus on the statement in the basic complex the women in whole shape to make decision in general live even it’s in local level or in international organization. 

Also in 1995, the economic and social council report is one of the official documents for general organization in fiftieth session didn’t mention the family in the whole the report that reached a population of 227 pages cross fourteenth units/chapters, despite it take about subjects that related such as; human rights, the improvement of the women, and the role of the women in development…. etc. 

The great disaster it when some documentaries about the family, which comes by term the family by repulsive contexts, even by it depiction as jail that man play into it role of executioner and the women play role of victim in context that called “ domestic violence “, it backs to the roles assigned for each of them, whether the name of common sense, or religions, or habits, and it requested to restoration the division of roles in order to justice for women.

Or the term family is used to legitimize the relations outside of marriage and abnormal relationships.

– The first context: Re-division of roles inside/within the family:

One of the most prominent contexts is take the definition of the family international documents, when we talking about gender roles inside the family under the name “ dynamite power inside the family “, that means basically raise stewardship and replace it into partnership. In the UN report, issued in 1985 the occasion to assess the achievements of the United Nations Decade of Women, they consider the barrier and stumbling block front women’s empowerment is making the man responsible for the family. The report requested states parties to change legislation:

“ The legislation and related regulations that restrict the role of the family and the head of the family on the man hinder women’s access to have credits, loans, material resources, and non-resources.

It also must enter changes in these fields that includes the equality of the women in have resources and there is need to exclusion phrases like: “the head of the family “, and entrance another phrases in the degree of comprehensive to express about the role of the woman in appropriate way in legal documents; insurance for it rights “. 

It’s not limited the point to just request upon the states parties to change the legislation, but rather induces the radical and comprehensive changes to all/whole community systems in order to reach a final situation where men and women share and spending on family, and also they share in household tasks. The state party prepares for the community to accept and encourage new roles and the average male and female, it was contained in the same report:

“ Priority should be given to the provision of basic social structures of society that was able for the community to reached the changes, in social attitudes it lead to acceptance, and to encourage the new roles for both sexes or modified. So that can exercise these roles, and should be reconsidered in household duties, and in parental responsibilities”. 

* The second context/ Restriction the authority of the husband / the father pretext of eliminating violence: –

In the recent report from the Human Rights Council at its twenty-ninth session:

“.. Women’s rights are particularly threatened at the household level, the family is the place for continued the traditional values, which stems from the patriarchal culture, and it’s an essential institution to maintain the patriarchal system. “

So the family became a “patriarchal system”, and it’s values became of man’s stewardship, obedient women and the consequent from travel permission, and permission to get out and … Values prepared by the United Nations “traditional” stems from the patriarchal culture that should addressed them, they are biased to the man, and threaten women’s rights!

* The most serious context: The legalization of illegal relations and homosexuality:

The term of the word family stated in the international documents in a context which is the most dangerous of all of them, demanded that need to recognize the existence of other forms of the family, and that means not only recognition of homosexuality, and pornography, but direct them by giving everyone the same rights of social guarantees, and inheritance, and … alike.

At the end of the last century in 1994 a document issued by the Cairo Conference on Population and Development called for remove all of obstacles and forms of discrimination between the normal relations, and anomalies in Chapter V of them, which was entitled “The family, its roles, rights, composition, and structure” full research entitled: (diversity of family structure and composition) of its articles:
“Governments should take effective measures to eliminate all forms of coercion and discrimination in policies and practices related to marriage, and other forms of association”

This year, it been renewed calls UN to the solidify contents of anomalies, and illegally within the family concept, and the matter has become more visible and crudeness, where he called the Human Rights Council in his report of April 2 of this year under the title: B. Family: The conceptual and social border / 1. Redefining family inclusion of a gender perspective:

“There are various forms of the family; for example, include a (different families) single-parent families, and families headed by women, and families that combine generations such as:

Grandparents, and families sponsored by the children (such as orphans and street children), and the families of lesbian, gay, and bisexual, and transgender persons, and holders of qualities sexes and families in which polygamy, and families of non-conventional (of mixed marriages between religions, or between communities, or between communities). “

The international documents do not miss that the center used in playing the terminology, while fired at what the religions enacted, and keeping with accepted practices by common sense names repulsive “traditional”, “typical” it launches a Muslim marriage; from Christian, or Jew, or even the religion of a human, not a heavenly the name attractive “funky”.

It is not only calling for normalization of relations with the family of the term sense enacted by the document, but rather calls for the next item in the above codification of pornography, and homosexuality in order to ensure the owners of illegal relationships, homosexuals the same rights of inheritance and custody of children, and pensions.

“ Many of the families that non-conventional aforementioned are not recognizes by all countries. Often the family known in the legal system as a unit based on marriage between a man and a woman, and its affect the rights of inheritance, property, child custody, pension, exemption from taxes, social services, and so on.

The legislations, and public institutions in some countries it required that a person who starts or ends one official treatment of male family members, or a male guardian, and as the state recognition is often a prerequisite to enable families to access services and subsidies, such as: housing/living, the protection offered by the state or non-state actors, so the lake of recognition leads to the marginalization of those families.”

While the UN report request for opening the door to the recognition of images pairing illegal, and non-natural, and codified it requests to not recognize legitimate marriages, such as polygamy.

In the above-mentioned report, and in the two items consecutive 25,26 stated that:

“ The working group believes that it should be extended family concept of the legal definition in the national legislation for the recognition of different family forms. The recognition of same-sex couples, whether they are men or women, and other forms of the family is a good practice that has already been implemented by many countries. In this regard, the Court Inter-American of Human Rights emphasized that it should not be deprived of the right of lesbian mothers in custody of their children.” 

“ However; all forms of marriage are not worthy of recognition. The working group called for the non-recognition of marriages in which it discrimination against women, which does not guarantee equality, and justice for women, regardless of their legal system, religion, custom, or tradition.

These marriages include, among other things include, early or forced marriage, temporary marriage, and polygamy. “

Thus, according to the international documents early marriage, and polygamy does not justice to women, and does not guarantee justice for them.
As for rationing illegal families, and the anomalies families is the one who guarantees the women’s rights!!

Talking in this matter be long, and what we would regard obvious we became need to confirm it, and consolidate its meaning, that will requires alarm on an important fact:
That the link between the meaning of family in Islamic sharee’ah, and its meaning in charters is only a correlation of the name, but the truth is different, completely different, while it means in the first man, and a woman between them a legitimate ligament, widening in recent; to include other forms of whether natural, or anomalies, was legitimate or out of wedlock.

In addition, the concept of the family if it match in the covenants and the law, it will be accompanied by warnings, and cons of either marginalization or alienation, and the most dangerous forms of equality with perverted.

We insist determined to reject any other form of the family except this concept: “ the group that has been linked to legitimate marriage, and it committed to the rights and duties between members, and the resulting kids from them, and contact with them their relatives.” 

ترجمة: سمية الفايز

المقال الأصلي:

http://www.bahethat.com/main/articles.aspx?article_no=14307#.VmU3LNKrS1s